Petitioners withdrew the writ petition as their grievance was redressed during pendency; the court dismissed it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
38 07.12.2020 rrc
WPA 9434 of 2020 (Prasanta Kumar Chattaraj & Anr. Vs. Eastern Coalfields Limited & Ors.)
Via Video Conference
Mr. Suman Dutt Mr. Arnab Dutt
…..For the petitioners
Mr. Shiv Shankar Banerjee Ms. Sucharita Barman Roy ….For the respondent ECL
Mr. Soumitra Bandopadhyay Mr. Priyabrata Batabyal
..For the state
It is submitted by Mr. Arnab Dutt, learned Advocate for the petitioners that during pendency of the writ petition, the petitioners’ grievance have already been redressed. Thus, the petitioners do not wish to press the writ petition.
In view of the above, WPA 9434 of 2020 stands dismissed as not pressed.
( Ashis Kumar Chakraborty, J. )
Prasanta Kumar Chattaraj & Anr.
Eastern Coalfields Limited & Ors.
Ashis Kumar Chakraborty
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
