Anil Kr Das v. State of West Bengal and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
No.38 Sl. No.3. W.P.A. 8931 of 2020 Anil…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
16.12.2020 p.b. Court No.38 Sl. No.3.
W.P.A. 8931 of 2020
Anil Kumar Das Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Sanjib Das. ……for the petitioner. Mr. Satyajit Talukdar. ……for the KMDA. Mr. Tapas Kumar Adhikari. …….for the State.
At the instance of the parties, this writ petition has come up in the list under the heading “To be Mentioned” for correction of the order dated December 14, 2020. The said order reflects that Mr. Satyajit Talukdar, learned advocate appeared for the petitioner. however, the fact remains, Mr. Talukdar appeared for the Kolkata Metropolitan Development Authority. Accordingly, the order dated December 14, 2020 be corrected to the effect that Mr. Sanjib Das, Mr. Tapas Kumar Adhikari and Mr. Satyajit Talukdar appeared for the petitioner, the State and the respondent KMDA respectively.
Let, corrected certified website copy of the order dated December 14, 2020 be forthwith made available to the parties, subject to compliance of the requisite formalities.
(Ashis Kumar Chakraborty, J.)
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Anil Kumar Das
- respondent
The State of West Bengal
- respondent
Kolkata Metropolitan Development Authority
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Calcutta HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- WPA/8931/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court