However, it is well-settled that the petitioner has recourse before the civil court itself to have its own order implemented. Although the petitioner submits that only computerized filings are being dealt with by the trial court, creating delay in the disposal of such matters, such reasoning ipso facto cannot confer jurisdiction on this Court to pass an order for implementation of injunction; more so, because such an order would open an unnecessary floodgate despite an equally efficacious alternative remedy being available. Moreover, if such an application is made before the civil court, the court shall have a wider option of exploring the factual veracity of the allegations