The High Court exercised its discretion to allow the withdrawal of Writ Petition No. 10120 of 2020 filed by the petitioner, dismissing the petition accordingly.
Withdrawal of writ petition allowed; liberty granted to approach appropriate forum.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
10/12/2020 Item No. 21 S. DE Ct. 8
Through Video Conference
W.P.A. 10120 of 2020
Sk. Mehdi Hassan. -Vs-
Union of India & Ors.
Mr. Mahammad Mahmud… for the petitioner
Ms. Sanshita Barman Ray ….for the Respondent
no.1
Mr. S.K. Ray Mr. A., Bhadra …for the respondent nos. 2
& 3
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, in view of availability of an equally efficacious alternative remedy, the petitioner wants to withdraw the writ petition.
Accordingly, WPA 10120 of 2020 is dismissed as withdrawn.
Liberty is granted to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum with the grievances ventilated in the present writ petition.
No order as to costs.
Urgent certified Website copy of this order, if applied, be supplied to the parties, upon compliance of all requisite formalities.
2
(Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya,
J.)
Sk. Mehdi Hassan
Union of India
Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
