The High Court dismissed the revisional application on the ground of non-press as the petitioner's counsel filed an instructing letter waiving the proceedings.
Revisional application dismissed as 'not pressed'.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. 32 Sl 33 Ssi 16.12. 2020
C.R.R. 3106 of 2016
(via video conference)
In the matter of :- Dr. Samir Kumar Nanda
Mr. Sk. Faridullah …petitioner
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner files a letter from his client instructing him not to press the present revisional application. The same is taken on record.
On the prayer of the petitioner, the revisional application is dismissed as “not pressed”.
Urgent photostat certified copies of this order may be delivered to the learned Advocates for the parties, if applied for, upon compliance of all formalities.
(Jay Sengupta, J.)
Dr. Samir Kumar Nanda
Jay Sengupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
