In CRR 2663 of 2018, the court observed that a final order had been passed, rendering the revisional application infructuous. Consequently, the application was dismissed as not pressed.
The revisional application is dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(via Video conference)
58 09.12.2020 Dd
CRR 2663 of 2018
In the matter of : Tata Motors Finance Limited …..Petitioner
Ms. Soni Ojha
…. ….for the petitioner
Mr. Madhusudan Sur, ld. APP Mr. Monoranjan Mahato
… …For the State
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a final order has already been passed in the impugned proceeding and as such, the revisional application has become infructuous. On her prayer, the revisional application is dismissed as not pressed.
(Jay Sengupta, J.)
Tata Motors Finance Limited
State
Jay Sengupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
