This judgment dismisses an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC for default, as the copy of the application was not served on the State and no response was received despite telephonic communication.
Application for anticipatory bail dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
07.12.2020. 53. as
C.R.M. 9820 of 2020
(Via video conference)
In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Chanchal P.S. Case No.772 of 2020 dated 04.09.2020 under Sections 448/376/506 of the Indian Penal Code.
In the matter of : Saidul @ Saidul Hoque.
…. Petitioner.
Copy of the application has not been served upon the State.
Nobody responded inspite of telephonic communication. Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail is dismissed for default.
(Suvra Ghosh,J.) (Joymalya Bagchi , J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application for anticipatory bail should be dismissed for default due to lack of response from the state.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Saidul @ Saidul Hoque
Suvra Ghosh J.
Joymalya Bagchi J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
