Allowed

Khalilur Rahaman @ MD Khalilur Rahaman and Ors. v. State of West Bengal

Calcutta HC2 Dec 2020CRM/9480/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court allowed an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC for petitioner Khalilur Rahaman and others. Ruling that custodial interrogation was unnecessary, it granted bail subject to a bond and conditions restricting movement and mandating weekly meetings with the Investigating Officer.

What did the court decide?

Permission to travel on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties, subject to conditions regarding interaction with the Investigating Officer and police station jurisdiction.

Khalilur Rahaman @ MD Khalilur Rahaman and Ors. Vs State… — Quashing and FIR | Calcutta HC (2020)

¶1

02.12.2020 SL No.14 Court No.8 (gc) (antibail allowed)

¶2

CRM 9480 of 2020

¶3

(Via Video Conference)

¶4

In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Ratua P.S. Case No. 96/2019 dated 21.02.2019 under Sections 341/307/34 of the Indian Penal Code. And

¶5

In the matter of: Khalilur Rahaman @ Md. Khalilur Rahaman & Ors.

¶6

….Petitioners.

¶7

Mr. Arup Sarkar,

¶8

…for the Petitioners.

¶9

Ms. Faria Hossain, Ms. Sonali Das,

¶10

…for the State.

¶11

The petitioners undertake to affirm and stamp the petition/application as per Rules within 48 hours of resumption of normal functioning of the Court. Subject to such undertaking, the application is taken up for hearing through video conference.

¶12

The learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case.

¶13

The learned Counsel for the State, however, opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

¶14

Having considered the materials made available along with the Case Diary and the statement of the victim and considering the nature and extent of complicity of the petitioners in the commission of alleged offence, we are of the opinion that the custodial interrogation of the petitioners is not necessary. We have also taken into consideration that four other co-accused have been granted bail by the learned trial court. Accordingly, we are inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

¶15

¶16

In the event of arrest the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) each, together with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C., 1973. The petitioners shall not enter the jurisdiction of the concerned Police Station except for meeting the Investigating Officer and/or attending the Court. It is also directed that the petitioners shall meet the Investigating Officer of the case once a week until further order.

¶17

Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail being CRM 9480 of 2020 is allowed.

¶18

All parties are to act on a website copy of this order on the usual undertaking.

¶19

(Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)

¶20

(Soumen Sen, J.)

Khalilur Rahaman @ MD Khalilur Rahaman and Ors. v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Khalilur Rahaman @ MD Khalilur Rahaman and Ors. v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kush Saha Vs State of West Bengal

Bapi Das and Ors. Vs State of West Bengal

Gunadhar Mandal Vs State of West Bengal

Anju Pal and Anr. Vs State of West Bengal

Jakir Mondal and Ors. Vs State of West Bengal

Raju Singh Vs State of West Bengal