Allowed

Monaj Jana @Manoj Jana @Kalia v. State of West Bengal

Calcutta HC1 Dec 2020CRM/9139/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court granted bail to the petitioner charged under the POCSO Act and IPC sections regarding a minor rape allegation. Considering the 500-day detention and exam of the vulnerable witness, the court imposed strict conditions including a bond with local sureties, prohibitions on contacting witnesses, and territorial restrictions, empowering the trial court to cancel bail for non-appearance.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of like amounts subject to strict conditions regarding witness interaction, jurisdiction, and court appearance.

Monaj Jana @Manoj Jana @Kalia Vs State of… — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Calcutta HC (2020)

01.12.2020

24 sdas Allowed

C.R.M. 9139 of 2020

with

CRAN 1 of 2020

(via video conferencing)

¶7

In Re:- An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Kolaghat Police Station Case No. 204 of 2019 dated 16.06.2019 under Sections 448/354B of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 8 of the POCSO Act but charge was framed under Sectins 450/376AB of the Indian Penal Code and Section 6 of the POCSO Act.

¶8

And

¶9

In Re : Monaj Jana @ Manoj Jana @ Kalia ...… petitioner

¶10

Mr. Suman De Mr. D. Ghorai ..…for the petitioner

¶11

Mr. Tanmoy Kumar Ghosh Mr. Arindam Sen

¶12

.…for the State

¶13

Petitioner undertakes to affirm and stamp the petition/application as per Rules within a month of resumption of normal functioning of the court. Subject to such undertaking, the application is taken up for hearing through video conferencing.

¶14

Accordingly, application being CRAN 1 of 2020 is disposed of.

¶15

¶16

Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for 500 days. It is also submitted that vulnerable witness has already been examined.

¶17

Learned Counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that minor was raped by the petitioner.

¶18

We have considered the materials on record. Allegations are no doubt grave. Balancing of gravity of the allegation against protracted period of detention suffered by the petitioner and as the vulnerable witness has already been examined, we are of the view that petitioner may be granted bail, however, subject to strict conditions.

¶19

Accordingly we direct that the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned Judge, Special Court under POCSO Act, Purba Medinipur on condition that he shall not intimidate the witnesses or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever and he shall appear before the trial court on every date of hearing and on further condition that while on bail the petitioner shall not leave the jurisdiction of Kolaghat Police Station until further orders except for attending Court proceeding and shall meet the investigating officer once in a week until further orders.

¶20

¶21

In the event he fails to appear before the trial court without justifiable cause, the trial court shall be at liberty to cancel his bail without further reference to this Court.

¶22

The application for bail is, accordingly, allowed.

¶23

(Suvra Ghosh, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)

Monaj Jana @Manoj Jana @Kalia v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Monaj Jana @Manoj Jana @Kalia v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Simran @Simran Sultana and Ors. Vs State of West Bengal

Rashid Sarkar Vs State of West Bengal

Santanu Ghosh Vs State of West Bengal

Janak Bibi Vs State of West Bengal

Tapas Bhaduri Vs State of West Bengal

Sk. Ajimusan @ Aji @ Babai Vs State of West Bengal