Allowed

Milan Mondal and Ors. v. State of West Bengal

Calcutta HC9 Oct 2020CRM/7649/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A Single Judge granted anticipatory bail to petitioners under Section 438 CrPC for offences under Sections 448, 325, 308 IPC. Bail was subject to conditions of bond, sureties, avoiding jurisdiction, and weekly reporting.

What did the court decide?

Application for anticipatory bail allowed; petitioners released on bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties subject to specific reporting conditions.

Milan Mondal and Ors. Vs State of West Bengal — Anticipatory Bail | Calcutta HC (2020)

¶1

Sl.15 09.10.2020 Ct. 23 SK/NB

¶2

C.R.M. 7649 of 2020 (Via Video Conference)

¶3

In Re : An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Murutia Police Station Case No. 167/2020 dated 26.07.2020 under Sections 448/325/308/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

¶4

And

¶5

In the matter of : Milan Mondal & Ors. ….. Petitioners Mr. Asraf Mandal …. for the Petitioners Mr. Imran Ali, Ms. Manasi Roy. …for the State.

¶6

The petitioners undertake to affirm and stamp the petition as per the Rules within one month of resumption of normal functioning of the court. The petition is taken up through video conference on the basis of such undertaking.

¶7

Having considered the materials on record and the nature of injury suffered by the victim and the nature and extent of complicity of the petitioners in the commission of offence, we feel that custodial interrogation is not necessary and we are inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

¶8

In the event of arrest, the petitioners be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each together with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local to the satisfaction of the investigating officer subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶9

¶10

The petitioners shall not enter the jurisdiction of the concerned police station except for meeting the investigating officer or attending the Court. It is also directed that the petitioners shall meet the investigating officer of the case once a week.

¶11

It is further directed that the petitioners shall provide the address where the petitioners shall presently reside to the investigating officer and the court below and shall report to the officer-in-charge of the concerned police station within whose jurisdiction the petitioners shall presently reside once in a fortnight until further orders.

¶12

Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail being CRM 7649 of 2020 is allowed.

¶13

Parties shall act on a copy of this order downloaded from the website of this Court.

¶14

(Soumen Sen, J.)

¶15

(Saugata Bhattacharyya , J.)

Milan Mondal and Ors. v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Milan Mondal and Ors. v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bappi Dey Sarkar @ Abhik Dey Vs State of West Bengal

Rinku Jana @ Gantait Vs State of West Bengal

Uttam Chatterjee Vs N.C.B., Kolkata Zonal Unit

Shyamal Ghosh Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Saddam Hossain Sekh and Ors. Vs State of West Bengal

Rafikul Sarkar @ Rafiqul Mondal Vs State of West Bengal