The Court dismissed the application for anticipatory bail C.R.M. 5366 of 2020 as not pressed by the petitioner. The pending application C.R.A.N. 3686 of 2020 was disposed of without any substantive hearing or reasoning being recorded in this order.
Application C.R.M. 5366 of 2020 dismissed as not pressed; Application C.R.A.N. 3686 of 2020 disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
04.09.2020 Item No.35 Dc/Aj.
C.R.M. 5366 of 2020
C.R.A.N. 1 of 2020 (Old No. C.R.A.N. 3686 of 2020)
(Through Video Conference)
In Re : An Application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Bagdah Police Station Case No. 141 of 2020 dated 04.03.2020 under Sections 420/406/506/509/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(I) of the SC ST Act.
And
In the matter of : Lilufa Shah. … Petitioner.
Mr. Mrinal Kanti Mukherjee. ... For the Petitioner. Ms. Faria Hossain, Mr. Subrata Roy. ... For the State.
Petitioner undertakes to affirm and stamp the petition/application as per Rules within one month of resumption of normal functioning of the Court. Subject to such undertaking, the application is taken up for hearing through video conference.
On the prayer of the learned advocate appearing for the petitioner, the application for bail being C.R.M. 5366 of 2020 is dismissed as not pressed.
The application being C.R.A.N. 3686 of 2020 is disposed of.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.) (Samapti Chatterjee, J.)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to grant or dismiss an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC which was not pressed by the petitioner.
How to dispose of the pending anticipatory bail application C.R.A.N. 3686 of 2020.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Lilufa Shah
The State
Tirthankar Ghosh
Samapti Chatterjee
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
