The apex court disposed of the civil appeal after the respondents conceded compliance with a Customs order. Consequently, the contempt rule was discharged.
Contempt rule discharged and appeal allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IA No. GA/1/2020 In APO/115/2020 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE
RAJESH JINDAL VERSUS SHIV RATAN BAJORIA & ORS.
BEFORE :
THE HON’BLE JUSTICE I.P. MUKERJI And
THE HON’BLE JUSTICE MD. NIZAMUDDIN
Date : 21st October, 2020
(Via Video Conference)
Appearance :-
Mr. K.K. Maity, Adv.
Mr. Bhaskar Prasad Banerjee, Adv. … for Appellant
Mr. Nirmalya Dasgupta, Adv. Ms. Shreya Singh, Adv. … for Respondents
The Court : It is conceded by learned advocate for the respondents that the goods in question have been delivered to his clients by the Customs authorities and the order dated 11th February, 2020 has been complied with.
In those circumstances, we think it fit to dispose of this appeal by discharging the contempt rule and disposing of the contempt proceedings accordingly.
The appeal along with the application being GA No. 1 of 2020 is, accordingly, disposed of.
(MD. NIZAMUDDIN, J.)
SN. AR(CR)
2
RAJESH JINDAL
I.P. MUKERJI
MD. NIZAMUDDIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
