The single-paragraph order dismisses arbitration application AP 66/2018 as not pressed because the petitioner issued an instruction not to proceed with the application under Section 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
OD-4
AP 66 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE
STERLING AND WILSON PRIVATE LIMITED
Versus
THE CHIEF ELECTRICAL ENGINEER/CONSTRUCTION, METRO RAILWAY, KOLKATA
BEFORE:
The Hon'ble JUSTICE ASHIS KUMAR CHAKRABORTY Date : 1st December, 2020.
Appearance: Ms. Radhika Misra, Adv. …for the petitioner.
Ms. Aparna Banerjee, Adv. …for the respondent.
The Court : Ms. Radhika Misra, learned advocate appears and submits that the petitioner has issued instruction in writing not to proceed with this application under Section 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996.
Let a copy of such instruction as produced by Ms. Misra be kept on record.
In view of the above, the application, AP No.66 of 2018 stands dismissed as not pressed.
(ASHIS KUMAR CHAKRABORTY, J.)
spal
STERLING AND WILSON PRIVATE LIMITED
THE CHIEF ELECTRICAL ENGINEER/CONSTRUCTION, METRO RAILWAY, KOLKATA
AShIS KUMAR CHAKrABOrTy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
