Dismissed
Arun Kr. Roy v. Keshablal Mukherjee
Calcutta HCCR/2287/1983
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
No.6. AB C.R. 2287 of 1983 Arun Kumar Roy Vs…
What the court decided
AI extract
No.6. AB C.R. 2287 of 1983 Arun Kumar Roy Vs…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
14.12.2023 Item No.2. Court No.6. AB
C.R. 2287 of 1983
Arun Kumar Roy Vs Keshablal Mukherjee & Ors.
This is a lawazima matter.
The appellant has not taken any steps for removing the defect. Obviously, he is not interested to proceed with the matter.
The Rule, if any, stands discharged.
CR 2287 of 1983 is dismissed.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Arijit Banerjee, J.)
(M. V. Muralidaran, J.)
Arun Kumar Roy
Keshablal Mukherjee & Ors.
Arijit Banerjee
M. V. Muralidaran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court