Applicants sought leave to withdraw a writ petition challenging auction decisions, opting instead to pursue pending revision applications before the Divisional Joint Registrar.
Leave granted to withdraw the writ petitions; liberty to pursue pending revision applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
909-ia 12368-25.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 12368 OF 2025 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 9900 OF 2024 WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 9900 OF 2024
Ganesh Pandurang Barke & Anr. … Applicants/ Petitioners
Versus
State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents
Mr. Prathamesh Bhargude for the Applicants/Petitioners.
Mr. N. C. Walimbe, Addl GP a/w. Ms. Ashwini A. Purav, AGP for the Respondent-State.
Mr. Tejesh Dande a/w. Mr. Bharat Gadhavi and Mr. Parth Talekar i/b Rushikesh Chavan for Respondent No.2. Mr. Ronak M. Utagikar for Respondent No.8.
CORAM : M. S. KARNIK AND S. M. MODAK, JJ. DATED : 7 th JANUARY, 2026.
P.C. :
the two Revision Applications have been filed before the Divisional Joint
Registrar challenging upset price and the auction notice. Learned counsel
for the Applicants/Petitioners on instructions wishes to pursue the said Revision Applications and seeks leave to withdraw the Petition.
Amk 1/2
909-ia 12368-25.doc
parties on merits since the Revision Applications are pending. Liberty to the Applicants/Petitioners to pursue the Revision Applications which shall be decided on its own merits and in accordance with law.
2/2
Amk
Ganesh Pandurang Barke & Anr.
State of Maharashtra
M. S. Karnik
S. M. Modak
As recorded by the court registry
21 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
