Withdrawal of writ petition; subsequent developments; cause for filing petition does not survive; leave to withdraw granted; Bombay High Court Civil Appellate Jurisdiction; respondents included Union of India, CIDCO and AAI; no merits adjudication.
Leave to withdraw the writ petition granted; petition allowed to be withdrawn. ¶18
The writ petition is allowed to be withdrawn. ¶18
Ingale
6-wp-8684-24.odt
Digitally signed URMILA by URMILAPRAMOD PRAMOD INGALE INGALE Date:2026.02.17 11:27:13 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 8684 OF 2024
Vinay Agarwal … Petitioner Versus Union of India and ors. .… Respondents
Mr. Dharam Jumani a/w Mr.Mihir Nerurkar, Ms.Gauri Joshi i/b Ganesh & Co., for the Petitioner.
Mr. G.S. Hegde, Senior Counsel i/b Ms.P.M.Bhansali, for the Respondent-CIDCO.
Mr. D.P. Singh a/w Mrs. Savita Ganoo, for Respondents No. 1 & 2. Mr.Ajay G. Khaire, for Respondent No.3-AAI.
Mr. Suhas S. Kadu i/b Wadia Ghandy & Co., for Respondent No.6.
CORAM : M.S.KARNIK & S.M.MODAK, JJ. DATE : 16th FEBRUARY 2026
P.C. :
subsequent developments, cause for filing this petition now does
not survive and seeks leave to withdraw the petition.
(S.M.MODAK, J.) (M.S.KARNIK, J.)
1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether leave should be granted to withdraw the writ petition on the ground that, in view of subsequent developments, the cause for filing the petition no longer survives.¶15-17
Union of India and ors.¶6
As recorded by the court registry
18 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
