Writ petition disposed of as infructuous due to amicable settlement between the petitioner and Respondent No.4 and the grant of an appointment on compassionate ground.
Writ Petition disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2026:BHC-AUG:21461-DB
drp
{1}
wp8248-24.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.8248 OF 2024
Mitali Pravin Gavate PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and Others RESPONDENTS
Mr. Shantanu A. Deshpande, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. S. R. Wakale, AGP for Respondent - State
Mr. H. A. Bajaj h/f Mr. A. S. Bajaj, Advocate for Respondents No.2 and 3
Mr. S. A. Raut h/f Mr. N. L. Chaudhari, Advocate for Respondent No.4
[CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J. J.]
DATE : 6th MAY, 2026
ORDER :
{2}
wp8248-24.doc
parties and as the Petitioner has got appointment on compassionate ground, the purpose of filing the Writ Petition is served. The Writ Petition is, therefore, disposed of as infructuous.
[ VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV ] [ NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI ] JUDGE JUDGE
drp/wp8248-24.doc
Mitali Pravin Gavate
The State of Maharashtra
Respondent No.2
Respondent No.3
Respondent No.4
NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI
VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
