Respondent no. 2/Scrutiny Committee ordered to decide the petitioner's tribe claim of belonging to the 'Naikda' tribe within four months.
Respondent No. 2/Scrutiny Committee directed to decide the petitioners tribe claim within four months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2026:BHC-AUG:2213-DB
1
931-637-2026.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
931 WRIT PETITION NO. 637 OF 2026
Komal Rajendrakumar Bassi Through Guardian Rajendrakuma
Basandas Bassi And Others
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Another
Mr. Deepak D. Choudhari, Advocate for the Petitioner Ms. B. B. Gunjal, AGP for Respondents/State
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.
DATED : JANUARY 17, 2026
P.C.:
[ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.] [SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.]
Narwade/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the claim of the petitioner belonging to the 'Naikda' tribe be directed to be decided expeditiously.
Komal Rajendrakumar Bassi Through Guardian Rajendrakumar Basandas Bassi And Others
The State Of Maharashtra And Another
SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE
ABASAHEB D. SHINDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
