Jitendra Tulsidas Vyas and Ors. vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Mr. Mohd Saeed Moghal, learned Advocate for the Petitioners and Mr. Satyadadev Joshi, Advocate for Respondent No. 2, jointly submit that the parties have amicably resolved their differences and the Respondent No. 2 has no objection for quashing the proceedings.

¶23

Petitioners and Respondent No. 2 are present in Court and are identified by their respective Advocates. Parties submit that they have settled the matter and they shall abide by the settlement agreed between them. Respondent No.2 reiterates that she has no objection for quashing the proceedings.

¶24

Mr. Satyadadev Joshi, Advocate for Respondent No. 2, tenders the affidavit dated 5^th December, 2025 affirmed by the Respondent No. 2 before Notary Ms. Veena S. Yadav along with her photo identity card. Said affidavit dated 5^th December, 2025, is

2

Gayatri shimpi

62-WP-5728-2025.docx

taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification. Respondent No. 2 (Smt. Jaishree Jitendra Vyas) states that the affidavit “X’ is filed out of her own free will and without any coercion or pressure from anyone. She states that the contents of the affidavit ‘X’ are as per her say.

¶29

In view of the statements made by the Respondent No. 2 in the affidavit ‘X’, Ms. Pallavi Dabholkar, APP submits that the criminal proceedings which are subject matter of this Petition can be quashed.

¶30

6. Considering the aforesaid circumstances, the nature of

¶31

dispute, the statements made by Respondent No. 2 in her affidavit and before this Court today, that she has no objection to quashing of the criminal proceedings, the relief sought for in the present Petition can be granted.

¶32

Writ Petition is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Consequently, the impugned FIR bearing No. 63 of 2023 registered with Malad Police Station and the charge-sheet bearing No. C.C.

3

Gayatri shimpi

62-WP-5728-2025.docx

PW/1160/2024 are quashed.

¶37