Writ petition dismissed in default as the petitioner repeatedly failed to appear and prosecute the petition despite earlier adjournment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 26-WP-5669-2025.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO.5669 OF 2025
Mahila Vyayasay Prashikshan Abhiyan Sanstha, Dist. Amravati Vs.
State of Maharashtra and Others
Office Notes, Office Memoranda Court's or Judge's orders of Coram, Appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders
None for the Petitioner.
Mr. H.R. Dhumale, AGP for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3/State.
CORAM: PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J . DATED : 07th MARCH, 2026
nobody appeared on behalf of petitioner and the same was kept back. In the second session at 02:30 p.m., when the matter is again called out, nobody appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
𝒫𝓇𝒾𝓋𝑒𝓁
Mahila Vyayasay Prashikshan Abhiyan Sanstha, Dist. Amravati
State of Maharashtra
Prafulla S. Khubalkar
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
