The court directed respondent No. 2 to decide the petitioner's pending claims regarding travelling allowance, service progression scheme benefits, and loan recovery within four weeks, disposing of the writ petition.
Direction to decide pending claims within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2026:BHC-AUG:12622-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 550 OF 2026
Madhavrao Kashinathrao Nagalgave VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Others
Mr. D. R. Iragle Patil and Mr. S. D. Irale Patil, Advocate for petitioner Mr. R. S. Wani, AGP for respondent No. 1 Mr. V. C. Patil h/f Mr. U. B. Bondar, Advocate for respondent Nos. 2 and 3
CORAM : Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi & Hiten S. Venegavkar, JJ. DATE : 24th March, 2026
PER COURT :-
1. Present petition has been filed for following relief:-
“B. The Hon’ble Court may be pleased to pass necessary order and direct the respondents to decide the representations / applications dated 31.3.2022, 17.7.2023, 23.2.2024, 26.9.2024, 29.11.2024, 15.4.2025 and dated 12.6.2025 as per Exh. C-colly. and clear the pending claims within stipulated period as found just and proper by this Hon’ble Court.”
Engineer from Zilla Parishad establishment has made composite representation. According to the petitioner, he has not been paid the
1 of 2
914-WP-550-2026.odt
Traveling Allowance Bills for the period 2017 to August, 2022, the benefit of service assured progression scheme for 10 years, 20 years and 30 years of service as well as representation regarding recovery of amount of Rs. 90,000/- after his retirement towards the loan sanctioned for construction of house.
(Hiten S. Venegavkar, J.)
(Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi, J.)
B. S. Joshi
2 of 2
914-WP-550-2026.odt
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the court should direct the respondents to decide pending representations regarding travelling allowance, service progression, and loan recovery?
Madhavrao Kashinathrao Nagalgave
The State Of Maharashtra And Others
Vibha Kankanwadi
Hiten S. Venegavkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
