Writ petition sought directions for a fair investigation into an FIR for cruelty and related offences; since the chargesheet was already filed, the court observed the informant could depose before the trial court. The petition was permitted to be withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.5084 OF 2025
Mrs. Gulafsha Javed Khan
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
).. Respondents
Mr. Dilip H. Shukla a/w Mr. Shaikh Faizan, Mr. Steve Fernandes and Mr. Kashish M. Singhi for the Petitioner.
Ms. Supriya Kak, A.P.P. for Respondent No.1-State.
DATE : 6th FEBRUARY 2026
P.C.
1/2
RaJesh Chittewan, PS
before the Trial Court, setting out the instances of cruelty. No further directions need to be granted.
and she has any apprehension to appear in the Court in any proceeding, the Police Authority shall look into in her grievances.
(SANDESH D. PATIL, J.)
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)
2/2
RaJesh Chittewan, PS RAJESH Digitally signed byRAJESH VASANT VASANT CHITTEWAN CHITTEWAN Date: 2026.02.0917:43:13 +0530
1 issue framed by the court
Whether directions should be issued to the State to conduct a fair and impartial investigation into FIR No.1017 of 2020 under Sections 498-A, 323, 504 and 506 IPC.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mrs. Gulafsha Javed Khan
The State of Maharashtra
Ors.
SANDESH D. PATIL
SARANG V. KOTWAL
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
