Maruti Venkatrao Tamshette v. the State of Maharashtra Thr Its Principal Secretary and Ors.

Bombay HC18 Apr 2026WP/4126/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Shalarth ID inclusion; proposal dated 05.05.2025; Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Nanded; Deputy Director of Education, Latur; AGP undertaking; notice waived for respondent Nos.1 to 4; forwarding within two weeks; decision within eight weeks; scrutiny and hearing if required; writ petition disposed by directions; Aurangabad bench; double bench (DB); neutral citation 2026:BHC-AUG:17038-DB.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed of on the strength of the AGP's undertaking recorded by the Court: respondent No.4 to forward the petitioner's proposal to respondent No.3 within two weeks, and respondent No.3 to decide the proposal within eight weeks thereafter after scrutiny and hearing to the petitioner, if required. ¶¶15

Maruti Venkatrao Tamshette vs the State of Maharashtra Thr Its Principal Secretary and Ors. — Bombay HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶¶15

Issue for consideration

Whether respondent No.4 (Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Nanded) would forward the petitioner’s proposal dated 05.05.2025 to respondent No.3 (Deputy Director of Education, Latur), and whether respondent No.3 would act on it for inclusion of the petitioner’s name in Shalarth ID.

¶¶11

Court's answer

Taking the learned AGP's statement as an undertaking, the Court disposed of the writ petition by directing respondent No.4 to forward the petitioner's proposal to respondent No.3 within a period of two weeks.

¶¶15

Ratio / Principle

Respondent No.3 was directed to decide the forwarded proposal within a period of eight weeks thereafter, after making scrutiny and giving hearing to the petitioner, if required.

¶¶15

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, Writ Petition No.4126 of 2026 (decided 18.04.2026), Coram: Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi & Neeraj P. Dhote, JJ. — Maruti Venkatrao Tamshette v. The State of Maharashtra & others. Petitioner sought directions to respondent No.4 (Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Nanded) to forward his proposal dated 05.05.2025 to respondent No.3 (Deputy Director of Education, Latur) for inclusion of his name in Shalarth ID. Learned AGP waived notice for respondent Nos.1 to 4 and, upon instructions, undertook that respondent No.4 would forward the proposal within two weeks and respondent No.3 would decide it within eight weeks thereafter. Taking the statement as an undertaking, the Bench disposed of the writ petition with those directions, adding that respondent No.3 would make scrutiny and give hearing to the petitioner, if required.

Maruti Venkatrao Tamshette v. the State of Maharashtra Thr Its Principal Secretary and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Maruti Venkatrao Tamshette v. the State of Maharashtra Thr Its Principal Secretary and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohammed Haroon Ameen Miyan Deshmukh and Others vs the State of Maharashtra through Secretary and Others

Shilpa B.U. vs the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary and Others

The Tahzeeb Education and Welfare Society through Its Chairman and Another vs the State of Maharashtra Thruogh Its Principal Secretary and Others

Rajendra Babasaheb Dhakane vs the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary and Others

X Y Z vs the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary and Anr.

Vyankati Harichandra Munde vs the State of Maharashtra through the Secretary and Others