Disposed

Ganesh Maroti Jagtap v. the State of Maharashtra through Its Principal Secretary and Ors.

Bombay HC2 Apr 2026WP/3471/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought expeditious disposal of pending Scheduled Tribe claim. Court directed the Scrutiny Committee to decide the claim within four months and prohibited the employer from taking coercive action against the petitioner solely on the ground of non-submission of the validity certificate until the claim is decided.

What did the court decide?

Direction to decide tribe claim within 4 months; injunction against coercive employer action pending decision.

Ganesh Maroti Jagtap vs the State of Maharashtra… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2026)

¶1

(1)

¶2

950- W. P. 3471-2026.odt

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

950 WRIT PETITION NO. 3471 OF 2026

¶5

Ganesh S/o Maroti Jagtap, Age : 26 Years, Occ. Servie, R/o. At post Nimgaon, Tq. Ardhapur, Dist. Nanded. .. PETITIONER

¶6

VERSUS

¶7

The State of Maharashtra, Forest Department, Through its Principal Secretary, Mantralaya, Mumbai.

¶8

Scheduled Tribe Certificate Verification Committee, Kinwat-1, Headquarter Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, Through its Deputy Director (Research) and Member Secretary.

¶9

Principal Chief Conservator of Forest (HOFF), IIIrd Floor, Van Bhavan, Ramgiri Road, Near Police Gymkhana, CBI Colony, Civil Lines, Nagpur, Maharashtra 440001.

¶10

Additional Chief Conservator of Forests (Admin Subordinate Cadre) M.S. Nagpur, 2^nd Floor, Van Bhavan, Ramgiri Road, Civil Lines, Nagpur 440 001.

¶11

Additional Chief Conservator of Forests and Nodal Officer, M.S. Nagpur 1^st Floor, Van Bhavan, Ramgiri Road, Civil Lines, Nagpur 440 001. .. RESPONDENTS

¶12

Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Chandrakant R Thorat AGP for Respondent/State: Mr. G. A. Kulkarni

¶13

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.

¶14

DATED : APRIL 02, 2026

¶15

(2)

¶16

950- W. P. 3471-2026.odt

¶17

FINAL ORDER (PER ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J):-

¶18

Heard.

¶19

By this Writ Petition, the petitioner is seeking expeditious disposal of his tribe claim of belonging to “Koli Mahadev” Scheduled Tribe, which is pending with the respondent/Scrutiny Committee since 3^rd October 2025.

¶20

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during pendency of the tribe claim, the employer of the petitioner has issued show cause notice on 24.08.2025 thereby calling upon him to submit

¶21

his tribe validity certificate, failing which his services would be brought to an end.

¶22

In that view of the matter, we direct the respondent/Scrutiny Committee to decide the tribe claim of the petitioner as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of four months from today.

¶23

Till the tribe claim of the petitioner is decided, the employers of the petitioner shall not take any coercive action against the petitioner solely on the ground of non-submission of validity certificate,.

¶24

Needless to state that the protection granted by this Court will operate only till the tribe claim of the petitioner is decided and he will not claim any equities.

¶25

(3)

¶26

950- W. P. 3471-2026.odt

¶27

With these directions the Writ Petition stands disposed of.

¶28

( ABASAHEB D. SHINDE ) JUDGE

¶29

(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE

¶30

YSK/

Ganesh Maroti Jagtap v. the State of Maharashtra through Its Principal Secretary and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ganesh Maroti Jagtap v. the State of Maharashtra through Its Principal Secretary and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanchita Mahendra Chavhan vs State of Maharashtra Thr. Secretary and Ors.

Yash Sayanna Karhade through Sayanna Iranna Karhade vs Sheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee Kinwat Thorough Member Secretary

Ranjeet Vitthal Sapkal vs the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary and Anr.

Sumit Sunil Thakur vs the State of Maharashtra through Principal Secretary and Anr.

Saloni Sanjay Kottawad vs the State of Maharashtra through Its Principal Secretary and Ors.

Junaid Ahmad Khan Manzoor Ahmad Khan vs the State of Maharashtra through Secretary and Others