Writ petition concerning elections of Respondent No.3; since the elections were already conducted, the Court disposed of the petition as infructuous without adjudicating any issue.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
sns 52-wp-322-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.322 OF 2024
Prashant N. Sonawane & Ors. … Petitioners
V/s.
State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents
Mr. O.V. Hingorani for the Petitioners. Smt. Kavita Sounkhe, AGP, for the Respondent-State. Mr. Siddharth Pitale h/f. Adv. Ajit Pitale for Respondent No.6 Mr. Tejesh Dande a/w. Adv. Bharat Gadhavi for Respondent No.7.
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND KAMAL KHATA, JJ. DATE : 24th March 2026
P.C.:-
already conducted and therefore the Petition has become infructuous.
(KAMAL KHATA, J.) (A.S. GADKARI, J.)
1/1
Digitally signed by SUMEDH SUMEDH NAMDEO NAMDEO SONAWANE SONAWANE Date: 2026.03.26 15:19:34 +0530
Prashant N. Sonawane & Ors.
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
A. S. Gadkari
Kamal Khata
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
