Chandrakant Iccharam Koli v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Efficacious alternate remedy; Administrative Tribunals Act; Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal; writ of mandamus; Junior Clerk appointment/joining service; salary and consequential benefits; writ petition disposed (not dismissed) with liberty to approach MAT; time spent in writ petition to be credited by Tribunal; all contentions kept open; Bombay High Court Kolhapur Circuit Bench; bench R.G. Avachat and Ajit B. Kadethankar JJ, order per Kadethankar J.; dated 27-01-2026; WP 2384/2024; petitioner Chandrakant Iccharm Koli; respondents State of Maharashtra and others; counsel Sushant Yeramwar (petitioner), T.J. Kapre A.G.P. (State); no precedents cited; no quantum.
What did the court decide?
Liberty to the petitioner to avail of appropriate legal remedies, as may be available in law, before the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal; the Tribunal to consider the time spent prosecuting the writ petition; all contentions kept open.