On petitioner's written instructions that the writ petition has become infructuous, the Bombay High Court withdrew the petition and disposed of pending applications as withdrawn on 12th June, 2004.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
903_WP_2206_04.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2206 OF 2004
| Narmada Estates Pvt. Ltd. | … | Petitioner |
|---|---|---|
| vs. | ||
| The State of Maharashtra and others | … | Respondents |
Mr. Rohan P. Surve for petitioner.
Mr. B. V. Samant, Addl. GP a/w. Ms. M. S. Bane, AGP for respondent-State.
CORAM : MANISH PITALE & SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, JJ DATE : 12th JUNE, 2026
P.C. :
. The learned counsel for the petitioner has received written instructions from the petitioner to withdraw the present petition, stating that it has become infructuous.
(SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, J.)
(MANISH PITALE, J.)
Priya Kambli
PRIYAKAMBLI Digitallysigned byPRIYA KAMBLIDate:2026.06.1218:08:29+0530
1/1
Narmada Estates Pvt. Ltd.
The State of Maharashtra and others
Manish Pitale
Shreeram V. Shirsat
Priya Kambli
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
