Disposed¶17

Pradeep Pralhadrao Kashale v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC21 Apr 2026WP/1950/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Consent withdrawal of two Bombay High Court writ petitions (WP 1949/2026 – Sanjay Dattatraya Funde; WP 1950/2026 – Pradeep Pralhadrao Kashale) v. State of Maharashtra, arising from FIR/Crime No. 70 of 2026, Deonar Police Station; investigation stated ongoing (API Kunal Bagul); liberty reserved to file appropriate proceedings upon chargesheet; all contentions left open; Ashwin D. Bhobe, J.; order dated 21 April 2026.

What did the court decide?

Both Writ Petitions (No. 1949 of 2026 and No. 1950 of 2026) disposed of as withdrawn; leave granted to withdraw with liberty to file appropriate proceedings in the event chargesheet is filed against the Petitioners; all contentions of the parties left open. ¶17

Pradeep Pralhadrao Kashale vs the State of Maharashtra — Bombay HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

26-WP-1949-2026.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO. 1949 OF 2026

¶4

Sanjay Dattatraya Funde … Petitioner Versus The State Of Maharashtra … Respondent WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1950 OF 2026 Pradeep Pralhadrao Kashale … Petitioner Versus The State Of Maharashtra … Respondent

¶5

Mr. Prateek Pansare i/b S. S. Kharat, for the Petitioners in both these Petitions.

¶6

Mrs. Anuja Gotad, APP for the Respondent – State. API Kunal Bagul, Deonar Police Station, is present.

¶7

CORAM : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. DATE : 21^st April, 2026.

¶8

P.C. :

¶9

Mr. Prateek Pansare, learned Advocate for the Petitioners in both these Petitions states that the subject matter of both these Petitions arise out of the FIR bearing No. 70 of 2026. He therefore requests for taking up both these Petitions together. Request made by Mr. Prateek Pansare is not objected to by Mrs. Anuja Gotad,

¶10

learned APP. At the request of Mr. Prateek Pansare and by consent

Arjun

26-WP-1949-2026.doc

of Mrs. Anuja Gotad, learned APP, both these Petitions are taken up together.

¶15

Mrs. Anuja Gotad, learned APP for the Respondent – State, on instructions from API Kunal Bagul, officer who is present in Court, states that the investigation in Crime No. 70 of 2026 registered with Deonar Police Station, is on going.

¶16

In view of the statement made by Mrs. Anuja Gotad, learned APP, Mr. Prateek Pansare learned Advocate for the Petitioners, on instructions from the Petitioners in these Petitions, seeks leave to withdraw the present Petitions with liberty to file appropriate proceedings in the event chargesheet is filed against the Petitioners in these Petitions. This request made by Mr. Prateek Pansare, is not objected to by Mrs. Anuja Gotad, learned APP.

¶17

In view of the statement made by Mr. Prateek Pansare, learned Advocate for the Petitioners in these Petitions and the no objection by Mrs. Anuja Gotad, learned APP, leave is granted to withdraw both Petitions with liberty to file appropriate proceedings in the event chargesheet is filed against the Petitioners

Arjun

26-WP-1949-2026.doc

in these Petitions.