Petitioner sought promotion and benefits. Court permitted withdrawal and disposed of the petition as withdrawn.
Petition disposed of as withdrawn; liberty to approach Administrative Tribunal granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2026:BHC-AUG:11238-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 1574 OF 2026
Ashish Ghanshyam Vaishnav VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Others
Mr. P. P. Khandagale Patil, Advocate for petitioner Mr. R. S. Wani, AGP for respondent-State
CORAM : Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi & Hiten S. Venegavkar, JJ. DATE : 12th March, 2026
ORDER (PER : Hiten S. Venegavkar, J.):-
1 of 2
930-WP-1574-2026.odt
by way of appropriate proceedings.
sough by the learned Advocate for petitioner is also granted.
(Hiten S. Venegavkar, J.)
(Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi, J.)
B. S. Joshi
2 of 2
930-WP-1574-2026.odt
Ashish Ghanshyam Vaishnav
The State Of Maharashtra
Hiten S. Venegavkar
Vibha Kankanwadi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
