Writ petition concerning a show cause notice for unauthorised absence against an employee. The Court issued notice to the respondents, declined to interject with the pending departmental proceedings, and directed their completion in accordance with law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
983-WP-15587-2023.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 15587 OF 2023
JAYPRAKASH PETRAS GAIKWAD
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Mr. S. D. Kotkar, Advocate for Petitioner Mr. P. S. Patil, AGP for Respondent – State
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.
DATE : 20.12.2023
PER COURT :-
05.02.2024. The learned AGP waives service of notice on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
absence and the reply of the Petitioner that has been tendered according to his contention, we do not deem it appropriate to interject with this proposed proceedings of the management. The same shall be completed strictly in accordance with the law applicable.
1 of 2
(( 2 ))
983-WP-15587-2023
[ Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J. ]
[ RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. ]
SMS
2 of 2
Jayprakash Petras Gaikwad
The State of Maharashtra
Ravindra V. Ghuge
Y. G. Khobragade
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
