Writ petitions dismissed as infructuous because the School Tribunal already allowed the respondent's retirement claim in 2011, leaving no matter for adjudication.
Partitions disposed of as infructuous; no costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
45-WP-4846-11+.doc
Sayali
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
SAYALI DEEPAK UPASANI
WRIT PETITION NO. 4846 OF 2011 WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 1532 OF 2011
Digitally signed by SAYALI DEEPAK UPASANI Date: 2026.03.04 16:54:25 +0530
Aarti Ravindra Joshi … Petitioner V/s.
Vithabai Pandirtao Bacchav and Others … Respondents
None for Petitioner.
Mr. P. N. Joshi, for Petitioner in WP/1532/2011.
Ms. Shraddha Pawar, i/b Dilip Bodake, for Respondent no. 1 in Both petitions.
Mr. P. G. Sawant, AGP for State in WP/4846/2011.
Mrs. M. S. Srivastav, AGP for State in WP/1532/2011.
CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J. DATED : MARCH 04, 2026
P.C.:
1
45-WP-4846-11+.doc
petition.
costs.
(AMIT BORKAR, J.)
2
Aarti Ravindra Joshi
Vithabai Pandirtao Bacchav
AMIT BORKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
