In a writ petition seeking directions against the Collector to submit a report pursuant to a prior order, the respondent's counsel waived notice and stated compliance with the report submission. The court disposed of the writ petition based on this assurance without further adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 910WP15111.2025.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
910 WRIT PETITION NO. 15111 OF 2025
Sayyad Nayum Maheboob VERSUS
The Collector Jalna And Others
Mr. Krushna S. Solanke - Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. V. M. Kagne - AGP for the State
CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI AND HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, JJ. DATED : 10TH MARCH, 2026
PER COURT : -
[HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR] [SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI] JUDGE JUDGE
SG Punde Signed by: Sandeep Gulabrao Punde Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 12/03/2026 19:31:25
Sayyad Nayum Maheboob
The Collector Jalna
Others
Vibha Kankanwadi
Hiten S. Venegavkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
