Writ petition seeking a direction to the Scrutiny Committee to decide the petitioner's pending tribe claim of belonging to the Mannervarlu Scheduled Tribe. The court directed the Committee to decide the claim expeditiously, preferably within six months, and disposed of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2026:BHC-AUG:10660-DB
(1)
952- W. P. 14999-2025.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
952 WRIT PETITION NO. 14999 OF 2025
JYOTI SUBHASH KANKAWAR
….Petitioner
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
…..Respondent
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. S. M. Vibhute AGP for Respondent/State: Mr. N. B. Patil Advocate for Respondent Nos. 3 & 4 : Mr. S. B. Pulkundwar
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.
DATED : MARCH 10, 2026
ORAL ORDER (PER ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J):-
(2)
952- W. P. 14999-2025.odt
(ABASAHEB D. SHINDE) (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE JUDGE
YSK/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Scrutiny Committee can be directed to decide the pending Mannervarlu Scheduled Tribe claim within a fixed time frame.
JYOTI SUBHASH KANKAWAR
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE
ABASAHEB D. SHINDE
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
