Anil Ganjidhar Pawar v. Yashwant Ananda Wagh and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition dismissed for petitioner's default/non-appearance; Aurangabad Bench of Bombay High Court; party-in-person (Anil Ganjidhar Pawar) absent despite express prior warning in order dated 20.11.2025 that the petition would stand liable to be dismissed; no appearance via video conferencing; Court noted apparent loss of interest; Mr. Abhijit M. Phule, AGP for respondents; short per court bench order containing no substantive legal discussion — citable only as an instance of dismissal for non-prosecution after warning.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution: the petitioner-in-person remained absent on the hearing date despite the Court's warning of 20.11.2025 that further absence would result in dismissal, he did not log in through video conferencing, and the Court observed that he appeared to have lost interest in the matter.