Condominium's writ petition against the municipal corporation was withdrawn pursuant to consent terms executed between the petitioner and respondent nos. 5 and 6. Consent terms taken on record; petition disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
902-WP-13809-2024.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.13809 OF 2024
Shree Apartment Condominium though its Secretary ….Petitioner Versus
Pune Municipal Corporation Thr. Its Commissioner & Ors. ….Respondents
Dr. Uday Warunjikar a/w Mr. Sumit Kate, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. Sameer Shinde, Secretary of the Petitioner present in Court. Mr. P.P. Kakade, Addl. GP a/w Ms. Priyanka Chavan, AGP, for the Respondent-State.
Mr. Bharat Gadhavi i/b. Mr. Tejesh Dande, Advocate for Respondent No.5.
Mr. Suresh Sabrad a/w Mr. Pratik Sabrad i/b. Mr. Vishal Navale, Advocate for Respondent No.6.
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ. DATE : 25th FEBRUARY, 2026
P.C. :-
instructions from the Petitioner, to withdraw this Petition. The said Praecipe is marked as ‘X’ for identification.
1 of 2
Kartikeya
902-WP-13809-2024.odt
of the Consent Terms ‘Y’
(ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.)
(RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)
2 of 2
Kartikeya
Shree Apartment Condominium though its Secretary
Pune Municipal Corporation Thr. Its Commissioner
Respondent No.5
Respondent No.6
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
ABHAY J. MANTRI
As recorded by the court registry
21 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
