Baliram Nama Pardeshi and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra Throu. Its Addl Chief Sec. Urban Development Dept and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Enhanced compensation; land acquisition; CIDCO; non-disbursement of enhanced compensation; execution proceedings; mandamus; Deputy Collector (Land Acquisition); Reference Court; accumulation of interest; public interest; time-bound deposit and disbursal directions; City and Industrial Development Corporation (Maharashtra) Limited; Bombay High Court; Writ Petition Nos. 8037/2024, 15848/2024, 13108/2025, 16153/2025; followed Ramesh Shivram Kadu (WP 4356/2025) and Dehubai Ramchandra Keni (WP 62/2025).
What did the court decide?
Mandamus granted by way of time-bound directions: Deputy Collector (Land Acquisition) to submit fresh proposals with interest and statutory benefits to CIDCO within three weeks; CIDCO to deposit the amounts within four weeks of receipt; Deputy Collector to deposit with the respective Reference Courts within two weeks; Reference Courts to disburse expeditiously and within two weeks of withdrawal Applications. All pending Applications disposed of.