Hanmant Gangaram Jadhav and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC2 Feb 2026WP/12875/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bombay HC Kolhapur; WP 12875/2025; Hanmant Gangaram Jadhav v. State of Maharashtra; disposed 02-02-2026; Avachat & Kadethankar JJ.; compliance with order dt. 16-12-2025 para 3; deposit Rs.20,00,000/- taken on record marked 'X'; further Rs.50,00,000/- to be deposited; fresh One Time Settlement (OTS) proposal to be filed within two weeks; respondent to consider OTS per governing policy; rights and contentions kept open; no statutes or precedents cited.

What did the court decide?

Writ Petition disposed of in terms of the order: deposit of Rs.20,00,000/- taken on record (receipt marked 'X'); petitioner to deposit a further Rs.50,00,000/- and file a fresh OTS proposal within two weeks, which the respondent shall consider in accordance with the policy governing OTS; all rights and contentions kept open. ¶¶18

Hanmant Gangaram Jadhav and Others vs the State of Maharashtra and Others — Bombay HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶¶18

Issue for consideration

Whether the writ petition could be disposed of in view of the petitioners' deposit of Rs.20,00,000/- pursuant to the Court's order dated 16 December 2025, the undertaking to deposit a further Rs.50,00,000/-, and the commitment to file a fresh OTS proposal within two weeks.

¶¶18

Court's answer

The Court took on record the petitioners' deposit of Rs.20,00,000/- made pursuant to paragraph No.3 of its order dated 16 December 2025 and marked the receipt 'X' for identification.

¶¶13

Ratio / Principle

If the OTS proposal is submitted by the petitioner to the respondent, the same shall be considered by the respondent in accordance with the policy governing OTS.

¶¶17

Key takeaways

In view of the above, the Writ Petition stands disposed of in terms of this order.ratio¶¶18
All rights and contentions of the parties are kept open.obiter¶¶19

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Circuit Bench at Kolhapur (Civil Appellate Jurisdiction) — Writ Petition No. 12875 of 2025, Hanmant Gangaram Jadhav & others v. The State of Maharashtra & others; disposed of on 2 February 2026 (coram: R.G. Avachat and Ajit B. Kadethankar, JJ.). The Court recorded the petitioners' compliance with its earlier order dated 16 December 2025 (paragraph No.3): their deposit of Rs.20,00,000/- was taken on record and the receipt marked 'X' for identification. Counsel for the petitioners undertook to deposit a further Rs.50,00,000/- in terms of that order and to file the fresh One Time Settlement (OTS) proposal, which could not be filed earlier, within two weeks; the Court directed that if the OTS proposal is submitted, the respondent shall consider it in accordance with the policy governing OTS. The Writ Petition was disposed of in terms of the order, with all rights and contentions of the parties kept open. No statutory provision or precedent was cited or discussed.

Hanmant Gangaram Jadhav and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hanmant Gangaram Jadhav and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Sangita Kondiba Dewane vs the State of Maharashtra Thr. the Secretary and Ors.

Firoj Mohammedhanif Tamkar vs State of Maharashtra Thr. the Secretary Social Welfare Dep. and Ors.

Abhijit Prakash Sanglikar vs the State of Maharashtra Thr. Secretary 1 Public Health Department

Mayuri Ramesh Udale vs the Union of India and Others

Rupesh Rajbahaddur Karaki vs the State of Maharashtra

Roshan Bhimrao Rathod vs State of Maharashtra