Allowed

Sagar Pandurang Kamble and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra Thr Dept of Education and Ors.

Bombay HC29 Jan 2026WP/11629/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner, a non-teaching staff member transferred/promoted as Assistant Teacher, was wrongly approved as Shikshan Sevak on consolidated pay by the Education Officer. Relying on prior decisions, the High Court quashed the impugned approval order and directed issuance of a corrected approval as Assistant Teacher in the regular pay scale within twelve weeks.

What did the court decide?

Impugned order dated 18.06.2025 quashed; Education Officer (Secondary) directed to issue corrected approval as Assistant Teacher on regular basis within twelve weeks.

Sagar Pandurang Kamble and Ors. vs State of… — Education and Admissions | Bombay HC (2026)

¶1

22-wp11629-2025.odt

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO.11629 OF 2025

¶4

Sagar Pandurang Kamble And Ors VERSUS

¶5

State Of Maharashtra Thr Dept Of Education And Ors

¶6

Mr.Chetan G. Patil a/w. Ms.Siddheshwari R. Chavan a/w. Mr. Prathmesh P. Magadum i/b. Mr.Mandar G. Bagkar, for petitioners

¶7

Mr.V.M.Mali, AGP for respondents

¶8

CORAM : R. G. AVACHAT & AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, JJ.

¶9

DATE : JANUARY 29, 2026.

¶10

ORDER :-

¶11

Mr.Chetan Patil, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, would submit that the petitioner was in fact appointed as a non-teaching staf member in the respondent – school and lateron, was transferred as an Assistant Teacher. He would submit that despite that the respondent - Education Oicer has granted approval as Shikshan Sevak on consolidated salary. He submits that the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the decision in Writ Petition 7706

¶12

of 2022 (Nagpur Bench) in the case of Suhas Rangraoji More

¶13

Vs. State of Maharashtra decide don 21.12.2023 . He also places reliance on the order passed by this Court at Circuit Bench at Kolhapur

¶14

¶15

22-wp11629-2025

¶16

in Dilip Rachandra Karande Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

¶17

(Writ Petition NO.12827 of 2025) , which reads thus:-

¶18

Vide order dated 3rd February 2025, the school management promoted the Petitioner from the post of peon to the post of Assistant Teacher with effect from 15th June 2023. Accordingly, a proposal seeking approval to the Petitioner's services came to be filed by the school management on 20th February 2025. Pertinent to note that proposal was filed seeking approval to the appointment of Petitioner as Assistant Teacher. However, vide order dated 15th September 2025, the Education Officer granted approval to the Petitioner's services as Shikshan Sevak. The Petitioner is aggrieved by such approval whereby Petitioner's pay has been fixed for 3 years on honorarium.

¶19

Now, the law is clear on this point. The case is squarely covered by the decision of this Court in Writ Petition No. 7706 of 2022 (Nagpur Bench) in the case of Suhas Rangraoji More vs. State of Maharashtra decided on 21 December 2023.

¶20

Learned AGP fairly admits the position.

¶21

Order dated 15th September 2025 granting approval to the Petitioner's appointment as Shikshan Sevak cannot be sustained. Accordingly, the same is quashed and set aside. The Education Officer shall issue corrected necessary approval to the appointment /promotion of Petitioner on the post of Assistant Teacher (by promotion) in the regular pay scale. Let this exercise be completed by the Education Officer within a period of 12 weeks from today.

¶22

Petition stands disposed of.

¶23

3 22-wp11629-2025

¶24

Mr.Mali, learned AGP would fairly agree that the impugned order should not have been passed in the style as it is and the approval ought to have been granted to the petitioner as Assistant Teacher.

¶25

In view of the above, the Writ Petition stands allowed. The impugned order dated 18.06.2025, passed by respondent no.3 – Education Oicer (Secondary) is quashed. Respondent no.3 shall issue the correct approval order to the petitioner as an “Assistant Teacher” on regular basis, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶26

[AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.] [R.G. AVACHAT, J.]

¶27

KBP

Sagar Pandurang Kamble and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra Thr Dept of Education and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sagar Pandurang Kamble and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra Thr Dept of Education and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Dattu Rama Chougule (Since Deceased ) through His Legal Heir vs Special Land Acquisition Officer No. 12 and Ors.

Vinita Rajendra Bhadule (Aka. Vinita Somnath Dikole) vs the State of Maharashtra Thr the Secretary, Higher and Technical Edu. Dept. and Ors.

Rohini Yashwant Salunkhe vs the State of Maharshtra Thr the Secretary School Education Dept. and Anr.

Netaji Narayn Bhosale and Anr. vs the State Election Commission Maharashtra and Ors.

Sangli Zilla Parishad Karmachari Sahakari Bhadekaru Malaki Gruha Nirman Society Limited Sangli Thr. vs Sangli Miraj Kupwad Municipal Corporation Thr. Its Commissioner and Ors.

M/S Om Enterprises Thr. Proprietor Mr. Nagesh Gopichand Motwani vs the Union of India Thr. Secretary and Ors.