Disposed¶33

Dipak Maruti Nilave v. Priya Vishnu Parab (Deceased)

Bombay HC9 Jan 2026TP/761/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Consent disposal of twin testamentary petitions (TP No. 120 of 2025 with TP No. 761 of 2025), High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Milind N. Jadhav, J., decided 9 January 2026; estate of deceased Priya Vishnu Parab; petitioner Shilpa Tushar Shingte nee Shilpa Vishnu Parab; Dipak Maruti Nilave as Caveator (TP 120/2025) and Petitioner (TP 761/2025); Consent Terms dated 09.01.2026 with pursis dated 10.12.2025, marked “X”; rights and obligations taken as undertakings to the Court; grant ordered per Consent Terms; advocate Mr. C.G. Bafna.

What did the court decide?

Grant to be issued to the parties according to the Consent Terms, duly specifying therein the terms thereof; both Testamentary Petitions disposed in terms of the Consent Terms. ¶33

Dipak Maruti Nilave vs Priya Vishnu Parab (Deceased) — Bombay HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

1. TP-120-25.odt

¶2

Amberkar

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶4

TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION

¶5

TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 120 OF 2025

¶6

Priya Vishnu Parab	.. Deceased
Shilpa Tushar Shingte nee
Shilpa vishnu Parab	.. Petitioner
Dipak Maruti Nilave	.. Caveator

¶7

WITH TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 761 OF 2025

¶8

Priya Vishnu Parab .. Deceased Dipak Maruti Nilave .. Petitioner

¶9

Mr. C.G. Bafna, Advocate for Petitioner

¶10

CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J. DATE : JANUARY 9, 2026

¶11

P. C.:

¶12

1. Heard Mr. Bafna, learned Advocate for Petitioner.

¶13

2. Parties have reconciled their dispute and filed Consent Terms

¶14

dated 09.01.2026 in Court along with pursis dated 10.12.2025. Consent Terms are signed by respective parties whereas pursis signed by respective parties and Advocate for Caveator. Advocate for Petitioner in TP No. 761/2025 has not signed the pursis. Petitioner in that Petition is present in Court. His identification has been checked and he is identified by Mr. Bafna. He would inform the Court that

¶15

1 of 7

¶16

1. TP-120-25.odt

¶17

parties have reconciled their dispute and sought grant as per the Consent Terms. Consent Terms are running into 5 pages. They are taken on record and marked “X” for identification. For the purpose of reference and convenience, they are scanned and reproduced below:-

2 of 7

1. TP-120-25.odt

3 of 7

1. TP-120-25.odt

4 of 7

1. TP-120-25.odt

5 of 7

1. TP-120-25.odt

6 of 7

1. TP-120-25.odt

3. All rights and obligations mentioned in the Consent Terms qua

¶29

the respective parties are taken as undertaking given to the Court and parties shall abide by the same.

¶30

Order in terms of the Consent Terms.

¶31

Department is directed to issue grant to the parties according to

¶32

the Consent Terms by duly specifying therein the terms thereof.

¶33

Both the Petitions are disposed in terms of the Consent Terms.

¶34

Amberkar

¶35

[ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]

¶36

Digitally signed RAVINDRA by RAVINDRAMOHAN MOHAN AMBERKAR AMBERKAR Date:2026.01.12 19:46:09 +0530

¶37

7 of 7

Dipak Maruti Nilave v. Priya Vishnu Parab (Deceased)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dipak Maruti Nilave v. Priya Vishnu Parab (Deceased)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Rohit Modi So Gopalkrishna Modi vs Gopalkrishna Dhirajlal Modi

Pallavi Abhijit Pandit And Anr. vs Anant Nathuram Patil (Deceased)

Rajesh Suresh Deshpande vs Suresh Yeshwant Deshpande and Sheetal Suresh Deshpande

Rajendra Tulsiram Ghare vs Tulsiram Laxman Rao Ghare Alias Tulsiram L Ghare (Deceased)

Ashok Anoopchand Jaswani vs Rajesh Habitat Private Limited through Its Directors Mr. Pratik Patel and Priyal Patel

Kamlini Chaitan Maniar vs Chaitan Manbhai Maniar