Gabriel Freddy Robert Adam v. Francisco Libano (Deceased)
Case brief
What is this about?
Bombay High Court Testamentary Department requisition order dt. 17-01-2026 on TP/259/2025 (AMH20230020342C202400005) with WILL/108/2025 and CHOL(L)/36751/2025 (AMH20230020342C202500019); no appearance; petitioner directed: Administration Bond for gross amount (Rule 420, F.118), citation-pasting affidavit (Rule 397 'BHC Rules'), attesting-witness affidavits on interpretation and interlineations (Rules 419 & 383 with F.102 note), proof that deposited Will copy matches original; removed from Board; liberty to praecipe with compliance details under Ch. XXVI for re-listing; officer: P. A. Jagdale, OSD.
What did the court decide?
No substantive relief; the petition was not finally heard (no appearance). The petitioner was directed to comply with outstanding requisitions — execution of the Administration Bond (Rule 420, Form No. 118), affidavit of pasting of citation (Rule 397), attesting-witness affidavits on interpretation of the Will and on interlineations (Rules 419 and 383 with Form No. 102 note) — and to prove that the deposited copy of the Will corresponds to the original. The matter was removed from the Board with liberty to move a praecipe with compliance details (Chapter XXVI) for re-listing and further orders.