Single judge held the criminal revision application abated due to the death of the applicant during pending proceedings and dismissed the matter.
Revision application dismissed as it stands abated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Mamta Kale
32-revn-295-2010.docx
MAMTA AMAR KALE Digitally signed byMAMTA AMAR KALE Date: 2026.01.2714:52:26 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Criminal Revision Application No. 295 of 2010
Dara Dadiba Gowadia … Applicant
versus
Poonam Chand Popatlal Doshi and Ors. …Respondents
Ms Farzana Khan i/b Mr Harshad Palwe, for the Applicant. Ms A A Deshmukh, APP, for the Respondent / State.
Coram: R.N. Laddha, J. Date: 23 January 2026
P.C.:
. The learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant informs the Court that the applicant has passed away and nothing survives in this revision application.
(R.N. Laddha, J.)
Page 1 of 1
23 January 2026
Dara Dadiba Gowadia
Poonam Chand Popatlal Doshi
R.N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
