Mohammed Jamil Moosa Hakim v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal revision application dismissed as abated because the High Court found the applicant had passed away prior to the hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed by SMITA SMITA JOHNSON JOHNSON GONSALVES GONSALVES Date: 2026.02.18 16:14:17+0530
27.revn256-11.docx
sg
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Criminal Revision Application No.256 of 2011
Mohammed Jamil Moosa Hakim Occ: Typist, aged about 62 years, residing at C.S.No.392/393, Hakim Bungalow, Shaikh Misri Road, Antop Hill, Mumbai – 400 037 (In Jail Mumbai Central Prison) … Applicant
versus
The State of Maharashtra (The Antop Hill Police Station) … Respondent
None for the applicant. Mr Arfan Sait, APP, for the respondent/ State. PSI Sunil Pildankar, Antop Hill Police Station, is present.
Coram: R.N. Laddha, J. Date: 17 February 2026.
P.C.:
Page 1 of 2
17 February 2026
27.revn256-11.docx
sg
that effect received from Police Inspector (Crime), Antop Hill Police Station, which is taken on record and marked “X” for identification.
Page 2 of 2
17 February 2026
Mohammed Jamil Moosa Hakim
The State of Maharashtra
R.N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court