This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(2)-PIL-35-22.doc
Digitally signed by BALAJIGOVINDRAO BALAJIGOVINDRAOPANCHAL PANCHAL Date: 2026.04.23 11:12:56 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.35 OF 2022
Dr. Vijay Uma Shankar Mishra Vs.
.. Petitioner
The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Ors.
.. Respondents
...
None for the Petitioner.
Mr. Jagdish G. Aradwad (Reddy), Advocate for the Respondent No.2/SRA.
Smt. Nazia Sheikh, AGP for the Respondent Nos.3, 9 & 10 - State. Ms. Kinjal Kakkad i/by Mr. Jayesh R. Vyas, Advocates for the Respondent Nos.4 & 5.
Mr. Shakeeb Shaikh & Mr. Noorain Patel i/by Diamondwalla & Co., Advocates for the Respondent No.6.
Ms. Saloni Sulakhe a/w Adv. Declan Fernandez, Ms. Krushika Udeshi & Mr. Darsh Shah i/by Dhaval Vussonji & Associates, Advocates for the Respondent No.8.
CORAM : SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR, CJ & SUMAN SHYAM, J.
DATE : 22nd APRIL 2026.
P.C. :
A praecipe is moved for speaking to the minutes of the order dated 8th April 2026.
[SUMAN SHYAM, J.]
[CHIEF JUSTICE]
Panchal
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dr. Vijay Uma Shankar Mishra
The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
State of Maharashtra
Shree Chandrashekhar
Suman Shyam
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
