A PIL was filed regarding the construction of a Primary Health Center at Gudsoor. The petitioner submitted that the objective has been achieved. The High Court disposed of the petition as infructuous.
The petition was disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 910PIL8.2019.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
910 PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 8 OF 2019
Bebinanda Chandrakant Muskawad Latur VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Others
Mrs. P. G. Sontakke - Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. R. S. Wani - AGP for the State Mr. R. K. Ashtekar h/f Mr. S. S. Manale - Advocate for Respondent No. 3
CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI
AND
HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, JJ.
DATED : 17TH FEBRUARY, 2026
PER COURT : -
of as having become infructuous.
[HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR] [SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI] JUDGE JUDGE
SG Punde
Signed by: Sandeep Gulabrao Punde Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 20/02/2026 10:59:18
Bebinanda Chandrakant Muskawad
The State Of Maharashtra
Vibha Kankanwadi
Hiten S. Venegavkar
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
