Allowed¶21

Savita Tushar Tidke v. Tushar Ramesh Tidke

Bombay HC5 Jan 2026MCA/295/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Section 24 CPC transfer of matrimonial proceeding; H.M.P. No.180 of 2023 moved from Civil Judge Senior Division, Niphad (District Nashik) to Family Court, Jalgaon; wife-applicant Savita Tushar Tidke versus husband Tushar Ramesh Tidke; no source of income; Court at Niphad about 175 kms from paternal house at village Pachora; inconvenience travelling alone; notice served through father of respondent who did not appear; application allowed; Bombay High Court Aurangabad Bench; Coram Y. G. Khobragade, J.; decision January 05, 2026; 30-MCA-295-2024.

What did the court decide?

Withdrawal of H.M.P. No.180 of 2023 from the Civil Judge Senior Division, Niphad, District Nashik and its transfer to the Family Court, Jalgaon for further decision. ¶21

Savita Tushar Tidke vs Tushar Ramesh Tidke — Bombay HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

2026:BHC-AUG:132

¶2

30-MCA-295-2024.odt

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

30 MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 295 OF 2024

¶5

SAVITA TUSHAR TIDKE VERSUS

¶6

TUSHAR RAMESH TIDKE

¶7

Mr. C. V. Thombre, Advocate for the Applicant

¶8

CORAM : Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J.

¶9

DATE : January 05, 2026

¶10

PER COURT :-

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the applicant at length.

¶12

Despite service of notice through the father of the respondent, he failed to appear.

¶13

By the present application under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the applicant / wife prayed for transfer of H.M.P. No.180 of 2023, from the file of learned Civil Judge Senior Division, Niphad, District Nashik to the learned Family Court, Jalgaon.

¶14

1 of 3

¶15

(( 2 )) 30-MCA-295-2024

¶16

After going through the present application, it appears that on 17.05.2019, the marriage between the present applicant and the non-applicant was solemnized as per the Hindu customs and rites, at ‘Mahatma Phule Mali Samaj Mangal Karyalaya, Pimpalgaon Hare, Tq. Pachora, District Jalgaon’. However, the applicant was tortured at the hands of her in-laws and the non-applicant / husband, which ultimately resulted to take her shelter at her paternal house at village Pachora. The applicant has no source of income to incur expenses for travelling to and fro to attend the court proceedings at Niphad. Further, the Court at Niphad is about 175 kms away from her paternal house, which causes her inconvenience to attend the proceeding and it will be very difficult to travel alone from her paternal village to Niphad for attending the proceedings on each and every date. Therefore, it would be just and proper to withdraw H.M.P. No.180 of 2023 from the file of learned Civil Judge Senior Division, Niphad, District Nashik and to transfer the same to the Family Court at Jalgaon for further decision.

¶17

In view of above, the present Miscellaneous Civil Application is allowed.

2 of 3

(( 3 ))

30-MCA-295-2024

The proceeding bearing H.M.P. No.180 of 2023 is hereby withdrawn from the file of learned Civil Judge Senior Division, Niphad and transferred to the Family Court, Jalgaon for further decision.

¶22

[ Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J. ]

¶23

SMS

¶24

3 of 3

Savita Tushar Tidke v. Tushar Ramesh Tidke

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Savita Tushar Tidke v. Tushar Ramesh Tidke

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Avesh Alais Faizan Raju Patel vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Baburao Shivaji Gade vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Ujwala Vikrant Patil vs Vikrant Anil Patil

Parmila Akash Salve vs Akash Santosh Salve

Nilesh Ram Salunke and Others vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Rohini W/o Parth Mutrak vs Parth s/o Dnaneshwar Mutrak