Marico Limited v. Ajay Kumar Garg
Case brief
What is this about?
Consent-decree termination of a Bombay High Court Commercial Division IP suit: Marico Limited v. Ajay Kumar Garg, Commercial IP Suit (L) No. 36761 of 2025, with Interim Application (L) No. 36856 of 2025 and Leave Petition (L) No. 36928 of 2025; decided 05-05-2026 by Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh. Keywords: amicable settlement, Consent Terms marked X, undertaking to the Court, decree on admission, Aadhaar identity verification, prayer clauses (a)-(d) of the plaint, suit decreed, refund of court fees, Court Receiver discharged without passing of accounts, Receiver costs payable within 8 days of demand, Leave Petition allowed. No statutory provisions or precedent cases are cited in the judgment.
What did the court decide?
Suit decreed in favour of the Plaintiff in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b), (c) and (d) of the plaint, with the Defendant submitting to a decree on admission based on Consent Terms accepted as undertaking to the Court; refund of court fees as per Rules; Court Receiver's Report disposed of and Court Receiver discharged without passing of accounts, his costs, charges and expenses payable within 8 days of demand; Interim Application (L) No. 36856 of 2025 disposed as it did not survive; Leave Petition (L) No. 36928 of 2025 allowed.