Disposed¶3

Rahul Viresh Mehta v. State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC11 Mar 2026IA/766/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bombay High Court interim application; extension of time to furnish surety by two weeks; Interim Application No. 766 of 2026 in Criminal Application No. 232 of 2026; Applicant Rahul Viresh Mehta; Respondent The State of Maharashtra; Coram N. J. Jamadar, J.; decided 11 March 2026; taken on board upon mentioning; disposed; no statutes or case law cited.

What did the court decide?

Extension of time to furnish surety by two weeks. ¶3

Rahul Viresh Mehta v. State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

Rahul Viresh Mehta v. State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dnyanoba Dasharath Pingale (Since Thr His Legal Heirs) and Ors. vs Pandurang Dashrath Pingle and Ors.

Daruwalawadi Co-Op. Housing Society Ltd. vs Sita Wd/O Pukhraj Chunilal Bafna and Ors.

Sabira Salim Khan and Ors. vs State of Maharashtra

Rajiv Gulabchand Pandey vs Mrs. Mary George and Another

Mr. Mehernosh Karkaria vs Urban Horse Property Developers Pvt.Ltd. Originally Known as- Tanna Pune

Rare Townships Private Limited vs Mitul Gada