Allowed¶17
Ashok Hari Binawat v. The State of Maharashtra
Bombay HCIA/500/2026
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Interim Application No. 500 of 2026 in Criminal Revision Application No. 8 of 2008; impleadment of original complainant Arjun Laxman Satav as respondent No.2; amicable settlement between parties; prayer clause (a) allowed; Bombay High Court, Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction; R.N. Laddha, J.; adjourned to 23 March 2026; record and proceedings to be received.
What did the court decide?
Leave granted to implead original complainant Arjun Laxman Satav as respondent No.2; Interim Application No. 500 of 2026 allowed in terms of prayer clause (a), with amendment to be carried out forthwith and notice to the newly added respondent; matter stood over to 23 March 2026. ¶17