Dismissed¶24

Vitthal Dagadu Katkar v. Arun Dagadu Katkar and Others

Bombay HC7 Mar 2026IA/3932/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissal of review petition; limited scope of review jurisdiction; review confined to correcting error causing manifest injustice; no re-agitation of grounds already raised and considered in original second appeal; relies on Lily Thomas v. Union of India (AIR 2000 SC 1650) and State of Telangana v. Mohammad Abdul Karim ((2024) 6 SCC 461); order dated 10.01.2014 in Second Appeal No. 53 of 2014 under review; Bombay High Court Circuit Bench Kolhapur; Sachin S. Deshmukh J.; interim applications disposed.

What did the court decide?

Review petition dismissed; Interim Application No. 3623 of 2020 allowed in terms of prayer Clause 'a'; remaining pending interim applications disposed of. ¶24

Vitthal Dagadu Katkar vs Arun Dagadu Katkar and Others — Bombay HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

43-RP(st)-4951-2020.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR

¶3

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

REVIEW PETITION (ST) NO. 4951 OF 2020

¶5

Vitthal Dagadu Katkar ...Petitioner Versus Shri. Arun Dagadu Katkar And Ors. ...Respondents

¶6

WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3623 OF 2020 IN REVIEW PETITION (ST) NO. 4951/2020 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3351 OF 2020 IN REVIEW PETITION (ST) NO. 4951/2020 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3932 OF 2025 IN REVIEW PETITION (ST) NO. 4951/2020 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3930 OF 2025 IN REVIEW PETITION (ST) NO. 4951/2020

¶7

Adv. Manoj A. Patil a/w Adv. Shubham R. Dhenge, Adv. Ankita D. mali i/b Adv. Gaurav Nankar, for Applicant/Petitioner.

¶8

CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.

¶9

DATE : 7^th MARCH, 2026.

¶10

P.C:

¶11

Not on Board. Taken on Board.

¶12

Heard.

¶13

For the reasons stated in the application, Interim Application

¶14

No.3623 of 2020 is allowed in terms of prayer Clause ‘a’.

¶15

The applicant seeks review of the order dated 10.01.2014

¶16

rendered by this Court in Second Appeal No.53 of 2014.

¶17

Having considered the contentions put forth by the learned

¶18

counsel for applicant, I have perused the order under review.

¶19

ZIP

¶20

43-RP(st)-4951-2020.doc

¶21

It is well settled law that review petition has very limited scope and party seeking review cannot canvas the original proceeding as like the appeal before the Court, as has been laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Lily Thomas Vs. Union of India (AIR2000 SC 1650).

¶22

It is further well settled position of law that the scope of review jurisdiction is limited only to correct the error leading to manifest injustice, as has been reiterated by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of State of Telangana Vs. Mohammad Abdul Karim [(2024)6 SCC 461].

¶23

The learned counsel for applicant has attempted to reagitate and re-argue the ground mentioned in the second appeal. As stated hereinabove, it is trite that it is not open for any party to re-agitate the grounds those are already raised and considered while deciding the original proceeding.

¶24

In view of aforestated circumstances, review petition stands dismissed.

¶25

In view of disposal of the review petition, pending interim applications stand disposed of.

¶26

[SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.]

¶27

ZIP

Vitthal Dagadu Katkar v. Arun Dagadu Katkar and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vitthal Dagadu Katkar v. Arun Dagadu Katkar and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Akshay Basveshwar Hire vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Dattaram Bala Baikar vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Dipak Balkrushna Yadav vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Bhagwan Pandurang Dinde Sahakari Dudh Vyavsayik Sanstha Maryadit vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Swargiya Chandrappa More Sahakari Dudh Vyavsayik Sanstha Maryadit Boriwade Thr. Its Chairman vs the State of Maharashtra Thr Its Principal Secretary and Others

Shri Lingbhairi Sahakari Dudh Vyavsayik Sanstha Maryadit Thr. Its Chairman Anant Tukaram Kasabale vs Mahadeo Sahakari Doodh Vyavsayik Snasha Maryadit