Sham Chandrakant Jagtap v. State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Bombay High Court appellate side criminal jurisdiction; short adjournment order dated 16th January, 2026; coram Manish Pitale and Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat, JJ.; lead matter CR. Appeal No. 31 of 2025 (Anil Laxman Sapkal and Others v. State of Maharashtra and Another); connected CR. Appeal No. 758 of 2025 (Dilip Vitthal Kamble); CRI-Interim Applications Nos. 70 of 2026, 4128 of 2025, 3224 of 2025 and 2444 of 2025 in Cr. Appeal 31 of 2025 (petitioners Anil Laxman Sapkal, Sham Chandrakant Jagtap, Dilip Vitthal Kamble); respondent State of Maharashtra and Another; 'due to paucity of time, stand over to 22/01/2026'; interim orders to continue till then; notation for Registrar Judicial-I; no merits, no statutes, no precedents, no quantum.
What did the court decide?
Adjournment only — owing to paucity of time the matters were ordered to stand over to 22/01/2026, with any interim order to continue till then; no merits adjudicated in this order.